The voice of W. J. Holloway
It is not often that you can hear the voice of someone born more than 180 years ago. Actor W. J. (William James) Holloway was born in Westminster in 1843 but at the age of thirteen his family decided to settle in Australia, a voyage on which his mother died. He took up acting in 1862 and the following year married, a union which produced four children. His second wife already had a daughter known as Essie Jenyns (1864-1920) whose talent Holloway developed - apparently driving her to fame as Australia’s greatest Shakesperean actress, and exhaustion. When she married brewery heir John Robert Wood in 1888 she gave up the stage altogether. The Holloways returned to England the following year and W. J. Holloway stood in for an indisposed Henry Irving by playing King Lear at the Lyceum in 1892 opposite Ellen Terry for a short period. His company continued to tour, most notably in South Africa, and he managed Terry’s Theatre in London from 1894. W. J. Holloway died at Clapham Common in 1913.
In 1909 Holloway made some speech recordings for the Odeon label. While many famous recordings exist from this period of great Shakesperean actors such as Lewis Waller, Sir Henry Beerbohm Tree and even private recordings of Henry Irving, these all display aspects of theatrical, declamatory delivery that sound almost risible to the modern listener. Holloway’s discs do not, and this may be because they were made with the object of reproducing the spoken English language in the clearest possible way for study purposes, rather than as a souvenir or an entertainment, as in the case of those mentioned above.
W. J. Holloway, Seven Ages of Man
W. J. Holloway, Polonius's advice to his son
From a technical point of view and date of recording, the recorded sound is extremely clear and it seems that the discs were recorded in a special way developed by Wilhelm Doegen. I am indebted to Jolyon Hudson for unearthing the following information about this process.
Until the introduction of electrical recording in 1925, the recording process remained almost unchanged since its invention by Edison in 1877. Essentially, this process consisted of a horn, usually conical in shape, which funneled the sound to a recording diaphragm mounted at the horn's apex. Through a stylus, this diaphragm cut the groove into a wax master.
The energy available for cutting the record was limited to the small fraction of acoustic energy picked up by the horn. The experimental distance test recording that Nellie Melba made in 1910 vividly illustrates the reduction in amplitude and the loss of frequencies as she moved away from the horn.
In addition to this limitation, there was the difficulty of capturing both upper and lower frequencies, the distortion created by the mechanical process, and the significant challenge of recording sibilants.
We do not know exactly how Wilhelm Doegen achieved the enhanced recording quality in his work. However, a photograph of Doegen and fellow linguist Alois Brandl, taken in 1916 during the First World War at the Wahn prisoner-of-war camp as part of the Königlich Preußische Phonographische Kommission project to collect recordings of the languages and dialects of internees, provides a clue.
The internee is shown standing with his face very close to the recording horn, while Doegen holds the back of his neck with his left hand. In his right hand, Doegen holds a prepared text for the prisoner to read. As someone by then well-versed in achieving satisfactory speech recordings, Doegen presumably adjusted the prisoner’s head position relative to the horn, giving him greater control over the process. He may have pressed the prisoner’s head closer to the horn to emphasize sibilants or achieve better sound quality where the recording process was at its weakest sensitivity.
Doegen also developed a special gramophone for post war recordings, known as the Doegen Lautapparate. The gramophone, like his records, was produced by the Odeon company. It featured two separate reproducing horns connected to the tone arm and reproducer, or ‘sound box.’ One horn, made of wood, was directly connected to the tone arm, while the second horn, made of metal, was connected to the tone arm via a longer route through a metal tube.
The design had two main purposes: first, the faint sibilants reproduced through the metal horn would reverberate more, and second, the slight delay caused by the different horn lengths would create a subtle echo effect. It is possible that a similar arrangement was used in reverse for the recording process.
Outside of speech recording, none of Doegen’s improvements would have made any difference to the sound quality of music recordings, the mainstay of the recording industry then as now. Moreover, persuading artists to record under such conditions would have been virtually impossible.
Blog by Jonathan Summers and Jolyon Hudson