Americas and Oceania Collections blog

Exploring the Library’s collections from the Americas and Oceania

36 posts categorized "Eccles Writer in Residence"

27 September 2012

Pet-Names and Pillow-Talk: Ernest Hemingway’s Softer Side

 

“Here is the expert skier, soldier, here is a naturalist, a navigator, an authority on bullfighting and on boxing. Here is a man who sought the most dangerous conditions the world could offer…” So says the newscaster from this 1950s clip. Hemingway was often portrayed like this by the media: an all round Übermensch who displayed grace under pressure and had a wicked way with his pen to boot.

When we think of Ernest Hemingway we might think of him as all these things – as well as war correspondent, deep-sea fisherman, and of course, as writer – but we tend not to think of him immediately as husband material. A womanizer, yes, but not the type of husband who might call his wife Wicky Poo, Lovebug, Kitty Kat, Small Friend or Picklepot, nor the kind of husband who would permit his own nickname ‘Little Wax Puppy’.

But his letters (which were ‘not for posterity but for the day and the hour’) pulse with an excess of sentiment. Not for Hemingway-the-letter-writer the cool economy of Hemingway-the-novelist. In contrast to his fiction his letters could be ‘as loose, devil-may-care, recklessly copious and repetitive as he chose… he wrote letters to warm up his brain… or to “cool out” after he had laid aside the current story or chapter’ writes Carlos Baker in his introduction to the Selected Letters. Letter-writing was the equivalent to the therapist’s couch, or the pillow wherefrom sweet nothings were whispered in the lover's ear. 

The pet-names and pillow-talk begin with his first wife Hadley. In a long list of grousing complaints about his posting to Lausanne in 1922, he concludes that ‘they all talk French and the Russians are miles out of the way and I’m only a little tiny wax puppy. Poor dear little Wicky Poo’, the letter over-runneth, ‘I love you dearest Wicky – you write the very best letters.’ This spillage of emotions continues when he writes to his first mistress (and second wife) Pauline Pfeiifer in 1926: ‘oh Pfife I love you love you love you so, and I’m yours all shot to hell.’ While studiously avoiding cliché and hyperbole in his fiction, in his letters he sinks joyfully into sentiment, like a penned pig released to the mud.

As I looked through the Selected Letters, I expected to see a change of tone or language in the way he treated each of his four wives. Though his letters to his third wife, Martha Gellhorn, were not included, her own letters tantalizingly reveal half the conversation. One might infer that the language used was in common currency by them both. ‘I love you Bug,’ writes Martha to Ernest in 1943, ‘Kiss all catsies. Take care of yourself for me. / Mook.’   

What is striking is how gloriously constant and yet inventive is his langue d'amour throughout each of his marriages. ‘I am just happy and purring like an old jungle beast because I love you and you love me….’ he writes to his fourth wife, Mary, in 1944. ‘Please love me very much and always and take care of me Small Friend the way Small Friends take care of Big Friends – high in the sky and shining and beautiful.’ Not so far from a syrupy Disney romance, but all the sweeter for it coming from Ernest Hemingway; media Übermensch.

What is extraordinary is how direct the artery is from the heart to the page throughout Hemingway’s four marriages and many affairs. They always give me great delight to know that this Man Of All Things (skier, soldier, naturalist ad infinitum) also indulged in much baby-talk and mush. The letters pulse with love. It almost makes you forgive him for all the mistresses.

Naomi Wood is one of the Eccles Centre Writers in Residence at the British Library. Her second book, Mrs Hemingway, is a historical novel that explores Ernest’s four marriages to Hadley, Pauline, Martha and Mary. Excerpts from the letters are from The Selected Letters of Martha Gellhorn (ed Caroline Moorehead) and The Selected Letters of Ernest Hemingway (ed Carlos Baker).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17 August 2012

Mrs Hemingway, Mr Hemingway and Miss Pfeiffer

Ernest_and_Pauline_Hemingway%2C_Paris%2C_1927
Ernest Hemingway and his second wife, Pauline Pfeiffer. Photograph courtesy of Ernest Hemingway Photograph Collection, John F. Kennedy Presidential Library.  

‘All things truly wicked must start from an innocence’ Ernest Hemingway wrote in A Moveable Feast, a memoir published after his death in 1964.

The last story of the Feast tells of a married couple ‘infiltrated’ by a rich young woman. It is the story of Hadley and Ernest and his mistress, Pauline Pfeiffer. Miss Pfeiffer, Hemingway wrote, used the ‘the oldest trick’ there is to snag a husband: becoming the wife’s ‘temporary best friend’. The story casts the Hemingways as innocents caught in the net of a rich socialite.

But other sources show a more complicated picture. Carlos Bakers’ Selected Letters, for example, shows an eminently more remorseful Ernest. In a letter to Fitzgerald in November 1926, Hemingway wrote ‘Needless to say Hadley has been grand and everything has been completely my fault in every way. That’s the truth, not a polite gesture.’

Two other volumes also show Hadley taking some share of the blame. Gioia Diliberto suggests Mrs Hemingway’s passivity contributed to Pauline’s success in her biography Hadley. ‘I tend to give up before other people do,’ Hadley commented. ‘I should have said to her, “No, you can’t have my husband.” But I didn’t.’

Hadley had had a lonely life before she met Hemingway. In many ways this made her too grateful for his ‘rescue’ six years earlier. ‘He gave me the key to the world,’ Hadley told her first biographer, Alice Sokoloff, in her book The First Mrs Hemingway. When someone else was favoured with this key, Hadley kept schtum and did not protest.

And yet A Moveable Feast has become perhaps too dominant in how we read the unhappy Hemingway ménage-a-trois. In his early letters Hemingway writes of his urgent and aching love for his mistress: ‘All I want is you Pfife and oh dear god I want you so,’ he wrote as the divorce papers landed on his desk from Hadley, ‘I love you love you love you so – and I’m yours all shot to hell’.

Furthermore, a recently published ‘restored’ edition of A Moveable Feast (2010) includes much material excised from the 1964 publication. While the Feast is remembered as a eulogy to Hadley, the 2010 edition goes some way in restoring Pauline’s reputation as something more than a snake in Dior. 

‘For the girl to deceive her friend was a terrible thing but it was my fault and blindness that this did not repel me. Having become involved in it and being in love I accepted all the blame for it myself and lived with the remorse,’ reads a ‘redacted’ section from the new edition.

Though much less satisfying as a piece of prose, the restored edition refutes the simple geometry of a married couple infiltrated by an outsider. The 1964 edition reads: ‘I loved her and I loved no one else.’ But the 2010 edition shows the hell of when ‘you truly love two women’. The 2010 Feast does not exonerate Pauline, but it does lighten her load.

Everything, in the end, is of course conjecture, but by casting the nets further out than just the ‘definitive’ Moveable Feast, we can see how the wickedness and innocence might just have belonged to all three.

Naomi Wood is one of the current Eccles Centre Writers in Residence and will be talking about her novel Mrs Hemingway at the Summer Scholars Series at the British Library on 22 August. 

 

 

14 August 2012

Team Americas looks forward to a great Fall events programme

We've been feeling decidedly down in the mouth after the Olympics - we’ve all enjoyed the last couple of weeks so much that it was inevitable that things would suddenly feel a bit flat. But we’ve now perked up considerably since we find ourselves not only very busy but with a lot to look forward to over the next couple of months. Matt and Carole are wearing their Beat hats as they prepare for the arrival of Jack Kerouac’s On the Road manuscript scroll in early October - how exciting is that! And then there is the accompanying programme of events, featuring a preview screening of Walter Salles’ new film of On the Road, and an evening with Amiri Baraka to mention just two. The full programme can be found on the BL’s website under events (check under each month), and details of the exhibition will be up very soon.

In addition to supporting some of the On the Road events/exhibition, our wonderful Eccles Centre for American Studies is sponsoring a fantastic range of autumn talks, including our Summer Scholars series (featuring e.g. Naomi Wood and Sheila Rowbotham, our 2 Eccles Writers in Residence), as well as events with Liza Klaussman (who, incidentally, happens to be Herman Melville’s great-great-great granddaughter!), Andrea Wulf, and Lord Putnam to pick out just a few. And how could we forget that there happens to be a big election coming up in the U.S. in November, and we of course have that covered too. For the full range of Eccles events see http://www.bl.uk/eccles/events.html/.

And as if that wasn’t enough, we’ll be showcasing some of our artists’ books on 4 September at Inspired by Artists' Books, we have David H.Treece speaking about The Meanings of Music in Brazilian Culture for Brazil World Music Day on September 7, and we'll be celebrating Jamaican Independence on October 5th . Finally, the Olympics are still in our thoughts as we look forward not only to Rio, but to our conference Social Change and the Sporting Mega-event on November 5, organised in collaboration with our Brazilian colleagues.

Whew! Hopefully, you’ll find at least some of these events of interest and we hope to see you at the Library in the near future.

06 August 2012

The Good, the Bad and the Dentons

Eccles Centre Writer-in-Residence, Sheila Rowbotham, writes:

I came across the Denton family from Wellesley, Massachusetts while reading the manuscript journals of Helen Tufts at Smith College. In the 1890s she was friendly with the two younger Dentons, William and Carrie. They were part of a radical circle intent on questioning both politics and social conventions. The archivist at Wellesley College, Jane A. Callahan kindly sent me an article by Beth Hinchcliffe on the Dentons’ extraordinary collection of butterflies.

She relates how William Denton senior lost his teaching post in England in the revolutionary year of 1848 because of his heretical views. Upon migrating to America, he threw himself into the anti-slavery movement. The anti-slavery cause gathered many other emancipatory aspirations around it and he met the woman who would become his wife, Elizabeth Foote, when he escorted her to safety from a furious crowd, outraged because she was working as typesetter and wearing bloomers. The couple travelled around the country lecturing on geology and natural history collecting minerals, fossils and butterflies. As the children grew older they accompanied their parents doing magic lantern shows to illustrate the talks.

In 1881 William went on a three year trip with two of his sons, Sherman and Shelley, to Australia, New Zealand, Tasmania, dying of jungle fever in 1883 when he tried to explore New Guinea alone.

It was enterprising Sherman who worked out how to preserve butterflies on a plaster mount covered with glass and they were soon exhibiting in the United States and in Europe. In 1900 the Dentons’ butterflies won the gold medal at Paris Exhibition, the Parisian couturier Worth designed gowns inspired by the butterflies, and they influenced the American Arts and Crafts pioneer, Elbert Hubbard. When Queen Victoria died, Shelley Denton was asked to apply his skill to preserving the flowers on her coffin.

This summer I went to do research in the Labadie collection at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor and there I learned more of the fascinating Dentons. Elizabeth Denton was interested in spiritualism, William junior and his companion and later wife May C. Hurd, were friendly with the early birth control campaigners Josephine and Flora Tilton. The Dentons were so remarkable that their contemporaries were quite unable to fit them into any known category. Neighbours would say that there were three kinds of folk in Wellesley, the good the bad and the Dentons.

Carrie Denton proved to be the unorthodox one; surrounded by non-conformists and free lovers, she struck out for propriety. When she and the lover of Flora Tilton, Archibald Simpson, were both old in 1943, he teased her for asking searching questions about his relationship with Flora in the 1890s.’You were conservatively moral and didn’t approve’. Carrie might well have observed that if you were born a Denton you did not yield to the opinion of others. After all had not William Denton senior edited The Social Revolutionist in 1856 which stood for ‘a free press, resting on a free soil’.

[S.R.]

13 July 2012

Only Connect: the secret lives of Hemingway's wives

The_Murphys,_Pauline_Pfeiffer,_and_the_Hemingways,_Spain,_1926

Ernest Hemingway sits in between Pauline and Hadley on a holiday in Spain in 1926. Pauline would become his wife the following year. Photograph in the Ernest Hemingway Photograph Collection, John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum, Boston (Wikimedia Commons)

All the best betrayals start in friendship.  And an eerie effect of researching the lives of the Hemingway women is discovering how deep these friendships went between wives and mistresses.

Hemingway had four wives: Hadley, Pauline, Martha and Mary. At a superficial level, the connections are intriguing. Martha’s father was Hadley’s gynaecologist (eat your heart out, Mr Freud). Mary worked for Hadley’s second husband’s brother in Europe during the Second World War.

These surface connections suggest a global cultural elite. Knowing your husband’s mistress, then, was highly likely. Whether you chose to befriend her was of your own doing.

The archives that exist for Hadley (no.1) and Pauline (no.2) document the women’s friendship in their letters from 1926. I love reading these letters, trying to read between the lines for Pauline’s betrayal but also Hadley’s connivance.

‘I’ve seen your husband E. Hemingway several times – sandwiched in like good red meat between thick slices of soggy bread. I think he looks swell, and he has been splendid to me,’ Pauline wrote to the first Mrs Hemingway in March 1926. How calling Ernest ‘good red meat’ might have provided any reassurance to Hadley, I have no idea, but they carried on being friends. Abruptly, at the end of 1926, the letters end, as well they might when one man transfers himself to his wife’s best friend’s bed.

While I knew about Hadley and Pauline’s friendship, I was surprised to find out about the friendship between Mary and Pauline (no.4 and no.2). Pauline often came to the Cuban house, the Finca Vigia, in the early 1950s, and likewise Mary made the crossing back to Key West several times. It’s thrilling to think of the ex-wife and the current wife’s choice words for their predecessors and successors; not to mention Ernest. 

Which leaves me with Martha Gellhorn (no.3). Martha was the only wife to leave Hemingway rather than be left. Although Martha and Mary (Biblical sisters they were not) were in Paris at the same time during the city’s liberation in August 1944, that’s probably the closest they came to meeting.

To my mind, Martha was the outlier in the ex-wife confederacy. After the divorce, it’s silence that characterizes her relationship with the Hemingway clan. Martha refused to be interviewed about her life with him. Unlike Hadley and Pauline, she wouldn’t be part of the ex-wife club.

There is, however, one surviving letter to her predecessor. She wrote it after her first meeting with the Hemingways in Key West in 1937. To my mind, the swinging cadences immediately evoke Pauline’s letters from Paris in 1926, when she was calling Ernest Hemingway a chunk of ‘good red meat’.

‘Pauline, cutie’ it begins - and here I can just imagine Pauline positively bristling - and ends, ‘In passing perhaps it would be as well to tell you that his collected works are pretty hot stuff not to say tops…. What I am trying to tell you in my halting way is that you are a fine girl and it was good of you not to mind my becoming a fixture, like a kudu head, in your home... Devotedly, Marty.’ None-too devotedly: four months later Martha would be in Spain covering the civil war with Ernest  – avoiding getting blown up by jumping into bed together. Hot stuff, red meat; how did the wives not see the writing on the wall?

When I first began my research I envisioned Mrs Hemingway to be a series of interlocking triangles, representing Ernest, wife and mistress, in any given decade. Now, in the midst of these letters and telegrams, it seems much more of a tangled web indeed.

[N.W.]

Naomi Wood is one of the Eccles Centre Writers in Residence for 2012. She is the author of The Godless Boys (Picador, 2012).

 

 

 

02 July 2012

Sheila Rowbotham, Eccles Writer in Residence: The Case of William Whittemore Tufts

I suspect it is unlikely dear blog reader that you are familiar with William Whittemore Tufts. Nor do I think you will know he wrote a novel called A Market for an Impulse published in 1897.  There are several  reasons why William Whittemore Tufts is not exactly well known and indeed I only I came across him while researching his daughter, Helen Tufts Bailie who became a Whitmanite New Woman.

Helen Tufts, who was proud of her ancestry, records in her manuscript journal at Smith College, Northampton, that the Tufts and the Whittemores (her grandmother’s family) had come to America with John Winthrop in the 1630s and fought in the American Revolution against the British.

William Whittemore Tufts thus possessed the kind of heritage which marked a young man out for notability in nineteenth century America.  However his life proved to be full of unexpected twists and rapid transitions. First his father, a lawyer in Charlestown , called Joseph, died in 1835 when William was only four. His mother, Helen found herself a widow in her mid twenties and moved back to Arlington where she moved in cultured Unitarian circles.

William inherited this literary culture, becoming a clerk for the publishers Little, Brown & Co. in Boston before trying his fortune in New York and the US Commissary department. Here he discovered the theatre, which remained a passion.

Inspired by the eloquence of the great preacher Henry Ward Beecher, in 1857 he went to study at Princeton where he edited the Nassau Magazine. Here he seemed to be on track for the ministry. However, William was bedeviled by principles, and his Unitarian upbringing  won out. He left Princeton in 1861, rejecting the Presbyterian ministry for a teaching post at Newark Academy. Here he conflicted with the principal and resigned. Again, in Newark his friends were literary men who would go on to become well- known journalists and editors. But William’s first break, a series of articles in the Newark Courier was abruptly ended when he criticized the  local ministers.

William was once more a student, this time at the New York Homeopathic Medical College. By the early 1870s he was just beginning to develop a practice with a wife and baby Helen to  support, when he  decided  he was destined for the ministry and left for Harvard Divinity School. However principles intruded yet again and he was not to be successful as a Unitarian minister.

As the family’s fortunes dwindled into first genteel poverty and eventually alarming debt in the 1890s, William hankered still after culture and the literary world which had eluded him and he began writing his novel A Market for an Impulse. Sadly it did not prove a hit and vanished from view. A few copies did however settle in libraries in Britain.

Searching for insights into his character over a hundred years later, I was excited to find it was in the British Library and waited eagerly for it to arrive from Boston Spa. Disaster! When I went to claim it I was told the novel could not be found . Never borrowed since digitalization, perhaps it is secreted in some cobwebby crevice hidden from view. I have been a reader in the British Library since the mid-1960s and this is first book that never came. Poor jinxed William.

I didn’t desert him even then. I got his novel miraculously through ‘Lighting Source UK’ and what did I find? You’ve guessed dear blog reader, I am sure, a  central character of impeccable principles embedded in a labyrinthine and chaotic plot filled with twists and turn.

[S.R.]

M.S. adds: The Library also holds a copy of this novel in microfilm (Wright American Fiction, reel T-35, MFR-3052 *6632*)

19 June 2012

Martha Gellhorn, pursued and in pursuit

256px-Gellhorn_Hemingway_1941

Martha Gellhorn and Ernest Hemingway on assignment in China. Image: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gellhorn_Hemingway_1941.jpg

An exciting new acquisition for the British Library’s North American collections comes in the form of Martha Gellhorn’s first novel, What Mad Pursuit. I have been in pursuit of this rather costly book for a while, so it was delightful to finally have the book in my hands.

The rest of Martha Gellhorn’s work is easy to come by, so why is this book so elusive, and so expensive? Published in 1934 when Gellhorn was only twenty-five, the novel attracted lukewarm criticism at best. Gellhorn consigned her debut to the past: she never listed it in her published works, and, once it had become out of print, it stayed there.

But reading the first and only edition of What Mad Pursuit has been a real pleasure. Crude as it is, the novel races though the tender years of protagonist Charis Day from her job as a cub reporter to her love affairs that abruptly – and syphilitically – end. (Four publishers had previously turned it down on the basis that it was altogether ‘too bold’ for a young female novelist.)

Bold it is; and brave too, even as the melodrama skates. Charis, the innocent chasing after justice and happiness, is a standalone protagonist, very different from Gellhorn’s later characters. One reviewer called What Mad Pursuit ‘palpable juvenilia’ – and that’s precisely why it’s interesting: it helps tell the story of Gellhorn before she became the feted war reporter, and before she became the second half of a very famous literary marriage.

Gellhorn chose to preface her first novel with an epigram from Ernest Hemingway’s A Farewell to Arms. Hemingway was Gellhorn’s literary idol: it was his prose which she held up as the perfect model; his photograph that was pinned against her college wall while she wrote.

On the novel’s publication, Gellhorn was two years away from meeting her hero; six years away from marrying him. What tickles me most as I look over Hemingway’s pontifical epigram – Nothing ever happens to the brave – is trying to puzzle out to what degree Gellhorn intentionally began her own mad pursuit of her author-hero.

History has it that the Gellhorn family encountered Hemingway on an unplanned detour to Key West during a Florida vacation in 1936. Was Martha’s plan merely to meet her hero? Or to seduce him and make him her husband?

Biographer Caroline Moorehead’s account of the meeting seems innocent enough. ‘They didn’t much care for Miami, and so they caught a bus to Key West… One evening they went for a drink in a bar called Sloppy Joe’s. Sitting at one end was Ernest Hemingway… reading his mail.’ But in Hemingway’s Boat, Paul Hendrickson casts it quite differently, arguing Martha was as much the ‘shameless’ pursuant as his second wife Pauline Pfeiffer had been a decade ago.

The questions over Gellhorn’s intentionality gives me ample room to explore in fiction what went on in those few juicy weeks Martha Gellhorn spent in the company of Mr and Mrs Hemingway. I wonder if Mrs Hemingway had seen the epigram to Gellhorn’s book; whether she noticed how glad-eyed Ernest became whenever Martha was near; whether it was difficult to watch Ernest in hot pursuit of the young woman as the author followed her on a train to Jacksonville. It strikes me now that perhaps it wasn’t so much the mentor who was in mad pursuit of the tutor, but the other way around. 

Naomi Wood is one of the 2012 Eccles Centre Writers in Residence at the British Library. 

 

01 June 2012

Sheila Rowbotham, Eccles Centre Writer in Residence: Meeting Mrs Satan in a hedged garden maze

 Sheila
Sheila Rowbotham, Eccles Centre Writer in Residence, Image (c) J. Swinson

I have become more and more intrigued by discovering the extent to which information and ideas were transmitted internationally between radicals in the nineteenth century. There is a curious spasm of recognition when an interesting historical figure turns out to have been aware of another who I had assumed to be in an entirely different bag. It is like walking through a hedged garden maze and suddenly bumping into a surprising cluster of ghosts.

While tracing an 1880s Bristol socialist, William Baster back into an 1870s Republican group in Bath, I was amazed to bump into a larger than life American rebel, Victoria Woodhull. Woodhull was a spiritualist, free lover, suffrage campaigner and member of the First International, dubbed by her opponents as ‘Mrs Satan’.  From a poor family of wandering clairvoyants and medical showmen, she had married at fifteen and became a mother at seventeen, leaving a drunken husband and supporting her family by acting. She was expelled from the International for arguing that the emancipation of women had to precede any change in the relationship between capital and labour.

She was mentioned favorably and her works extracted, in an old newspaper The International Herald. The link was William Harrison Riley a Republican and member of the First International who ran a Temperance coffee house in Bristol and knew William Baster. As Riley’s hopes of international revolution dimmed he went local, issuing vegetarian recipes for “Buttered or Rumbled” (our scrambled) eggs and then, when the coffee house collapsed, moving  to a communal farm in Totley, near Sheffield, where he encountered Edward Carpenter.  When both international and local socialism failed him Riley would migrate in despair in an unsuccessful effort to join a utopian colony in the United States: Woodhull in contrast married a wealthy man and settled in Britain.

‘Woodhull’ and ‘Riley’ are names to historians, but it is possible to  uncover even more obscure connections.  Fabrice Bensimon, who has examined the social and cultural impact of several thousand British workers to France in the  first half of the  nineteenth century has noted a growing interest in these ‘connected’ histories, reporting how the British listened to a comrade reading from a Chartist newspaper in Brittany in the late 1840s (Past and Present no. 213 Nov. 2011).

I went recently to look at the papers of William Morris’ Socialist League in the  Institute of Social History in Amsterdam They contain numerous letters expressing routine complaints about not receiving  the journal Commonweal and frequent apologies for not sending the money for sales which made me smile in recognition. But among them I also came across  references to workers who had tried their luck in America and returned. I was pursuing William Bailie, a basket maker and Socialist League member who went to Boston and wrote for Liberty, the individualist anarchist paper.  How he came to make the decision to migrate is something I may never know, but it was evident from the letters that information was circulating in working class circles about life across the Atlantic.

Bailie was a frequent contributor to Liberty and wrote a biography of the anarchistic community builder  Josiah Warren. I first picked up his trail though because two of the women I am writing about, Helena Born and Helen Tufts fell in love with him – which kind of takes us back to Victoria Woodhull. Quite how though is another shaggy dog story and too long for a blog.

[S.R.]

N.b., All the Eccles Centre Writers in Residence posts are collected here.

Americas and Oceania Collections blog recent posts

Archives

Tags

Other British Library blogs