Update: details of more digitised records online can be found in a newer post, Further digitised India Office Records now online - Untold lives blog.

This post provides details of digitised collections from the India Office Records and Private Papers which are available online while we recover from the cyberattack.

It builds on the previous blog posts, Interim ways of working with the India Office Records and Private Papers and IOR catalogue records added to Discovery platform. 

The focus is on collections held by the British Library, although we do mention external sites which have a content overlap with some of our currently inaccessible digitised collections.

Qatar Digital Library (free access)

Over 2 million images, primarily taken from the IOR and Private Papers, with a focus on the Gulf region, plus Arabic scientific manuscripts from the British Library.

Qatar Digital Library (qdl.qa)

British Library Research Repository (open access)

A small amount of IOR material has been made available here, including the India Office Lists, a selection of Government of India Administration Reports, and a selection of indexes for the East India Company dispatches.

Datasets from the India Office Records and Private Papers // British Library (bl.uk)

Endangered Archives Programme - Survey of East India Company and Colonial materials of Jamestown, St Helena (free access)

This project surveyed relevant archives at Jamestown and digitised a selection of materials.

https://eap.bl.uk/project/EAP524

Botany and medicine resources (free access)

While the Botany in British India collection remains unavailable, you may find relevant published material online at the Biodiversity Heritage Library. 

While the India Office Medical Archive collection remains unavailable, you may find relevant published material online at the National Library of Scotland Medical History of British India site.

Adam Matthew - East India Company (subscription)

Focused on the Company period (1600-1858), and divided into six modules. An overview of the records included can be found here: Nature and Scope - East India Company - Adam Matthew Digital (amdigital.co.uk) 

Adam Matthew - Area Studies: India (subscription)

Digitised from microfilm, this resource includes official and personal papers of George Curzon, Viceroy of India 1898-1905, from Mss Eur F111 and F112; Indian Newspaper Reports c1868-1942, from IOR/L/R/5; a selection of personal diaries by military and civil office holders, from across the Private Papers; and a selection of publications on India and Britain by Indian authors, from the India Office Library collections.

Adam Matthew - Area Studies: India  

Find My Past - British India Collection (subscription)

This service will let you search and view digitised military, civil service and medical personnel records, plus birth, baptism, marriage, death and burial registers, wills and probate records.

Find My Past - British India Office Collection (findmypast.co.uk) 

Gale Cengage resources (subscription)

Papers from the Public and Judicial Department (IOR/L/PJ) appear in Refugees, Relief and Resettlement: Forced Migration and WW2.

Papers from the Military Records (IOR/L/MIL), Political and Secret Department (IOR/L/PS) and Burma Office (IOR/M) appear in China and the Modern World: Diplomacy and Political Secrets, 1869-1950. 

 

When the East India Company (EIC) invaded the South Indian kingdom of Sivaganga in 1772, they met with opposition from Indian warrior women.  These women were a diverse group from different walks of life - royal household, rural areas, across all caste groups.  Although many of their names and stories have not found a place in history, they have survived in local folklore, songs, bharathanatyam performances, and have been immortalised as deities in the local temples.

View of Sivaganga, Mysore, India. Wash-drawing by Colin MacKenzie, 1800 - British Library WD570.

Here is the story of three of these early female freedom fighters: Velu Nachiyar, Udaiyaal and Kuyili.  As the earliest women to rise against the EIC, their lives offer a glimpse into the beginnings of the anti-colonial movements, evoking an image of resilience and fortitude.

Rani Velu Nachiyar was a formidable Tamil Queen, who was both admired and vilified by the British for her valour and bravery in defending her kingdom.  She was born in 1730 to the Raja and Rani of the Ramnad kingdom. Skilled in the art of warfare and weaponry, Velu Nachiyar was also a scholar, and mastered several languages including English, French and Urdu.  At the age of 16, she married the prince of Sivaganga, Muthuvadugananthur Udaiyathevar. In 1750, Velu Nachiyar and her husband became monarchs of the Kingdom of Sivaganga.

Sword with double edged steel blade; iron hilt, guard, pommel and reinforcements. Two brass jingles below the pommel cap.Tamil Nadu (Sivaganga) India, 17th century. V&A Collections (Accession No. IM.11-1924).

In 1772, EIC troops, alongside the Nawab of Arcot’s son, invaded Sivaganga and marched towards the Kalaiyar Kovil Fort.  The Raja of Sivaganga was killed at the Battle of Kalaiyar Kovil on 25 June.  The kingdom fell under enemy control and the Kalaiyar Kovil Fort was plundered.  Rani Velu Nachiyar and her daughter Vellachi escaped capture through the sacrifice of Udaiyaal, a village woman who refused to reveal their secret hideout during interrogation and who was killed for her insubordination.  Rani Velu Nachiyar and Vellachi fled Sivaganga and sought refuge near Dindigul.

View of Dindigul. Tamil Nadu, India, 1790 - British Library WD 640, f.3(16)).

During her eight-year exile, Rani Velu Nachiyar acquired influential alliances with neighbouring rulers (e.g. Gopala Nayaker, Hyder Ali) who supported her preparations for battle against the EIC, providing additional soldiers, weapons, resources and training. Rani Nachiyar built an army of fierce female warriors that she named after Udaiyaal.

Mausoleum of Haidar Ali near Mysore, Karnataka. Coloured aquatint by J. Wells after A. Allan, 1794 -Wellcome Collections (Reference: 29869i).

In 1780, Rani Velu Nachiyar and the Udaiyaal army skilfully infiltrated Sivaganga.  Aware of the superior military prowess of the British, Rani Nachiyar used her knowledge of the terrain and employed guerrilla warfare tactics - spies, sabotage, ambush.  Rani Nachiyar’s military advisor was Kuyili, a woman from a lower caste background.  As a spy for the royal household, she had protected the Rani’s life on multiple occasions and soon rose to the rank of commander-in-chief of the Udaiyaal women’s army.  At the Battle of Sivaganga, Kuyili devised a strategy to attack the EIC’s weapons storage.  Disguised as a rural woman, Kuyili entered the secure storehouse unnoticed and set herself ablaze, destroying the EIC’s weapons and ammunitions.  The EIC and the Nawab fled from Sivaganga in defeat and Rani Nachiyar regained her Kingdom.  The Tamil Queen ruled Sivaganga for another decade before handing the kingdom to her daughter.

View of Shevagunga on the road to Seringapatam. Wash-drawing by Robert Home, 1792 - British Library WD3775[14].

In recent years India has honoured the memory of these women warriors through issuing commemorative stamps, installing monuments and memorials.

Rani Velu Nachiyar on Indian postage stamp 2008- Wikimedia Commons

The contribution of these women as warriors vanished at the intersection of colonialism and patriarchy, instead brown women were recast as helpless and in need of saving. I hope this blog post creates curiosity and the excavation of more stories of Warrior Women!

CC-BY
Theeba Krishnamoorthy
Research Fellow, University of East London

Creative Commons Attribution licence

Further reading:
Archer, Mildred. British Drawings in the India Office Library, Vol. 2: Official and Professional Artists (London: 1969), p474-475.
Letters received from Madras (28 Feb 1772 - 29 Oct 1773), including letters from General Smith regarding the Carracoil War. British Library, IOR/E/4/305.
Mishra, A., Mishra, M. and Paluri, L. (2021) 'Velu Nachiyar: The Veeramangai who petrified the British'. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 12(8).

NB In the British Library archives: (1) Raja (King) Muthuvadugananthur Udaiyathevar of Sivaganga is referred to as Nalcooty Polygar; and (2) Kalaiyar Kovil is spelt as Kella Coil or Carracoil.

 

The Harley Manuscripts, over 7,000 volumes spanning the period from the 8th to the early 18th century, are one of the 'foundation collections' of the British Library.  Over the last few years, the Library has been working to make revised catalogue descriptions for them available online.  So far, cataloguing of medieval manuscripts in the collection has been completed, throwing up some fascinating discoveries on the way, as keen readers of the BL’s Medieval Manuscripts blog will already know.  But beside these medieval treasures, Robert Harley (1661–1724) and his son Edward Harley (1689-1741) collected many later manuscripts, dating from the 17th century and the early years of the 18th century.  Post-1600 manuscripts make up nearly half the entire collection.  Some had already been re-catalogued as part of previous projects (Science manuscripts; Greek manuscripts; Hebrew manuscripts; Tudor & Stuart manuscript pamphleteering; etc.), but until 2018 the bulk of post-1600 manuscripts remained to be added to the online catalogue.  The current project aims to update descriptions for post-1600 manuscripts given in the four volume printed Catalogue of the Harleian Manuscripts in the British Museum (1808-1812), in line with modern cataloguing practice, and add them to the online catalogue.

Séguier binding showing the monogram of Pierre Séguier and his wife Madeleine Fabri (Harley MS 3979)

Notable manuscripts include the collections of Sir Simonds D’Ewes (1602–1650), politician and antiquary, one of the first libraries acquired by Robert Harley in 1704, forming about one twelfth of the Harley Manuscripts as a whole, and the copious heraldic collections of the four-generation Holme family of Chester.  Besides English, Welsh and Scottish material, the Harleys used overseas agents to purchase manuscripts from the Continent, especially France, Germany and Italy,.  These included manuscripts from the libraries of the German scholar J. G. Graevius (1632-1703), the French statesman and patron Pierre Séguier (1588-1672), and other collectors.  Besides political, heraldic, theological and legal manuscripts, there are ships logs and travel narratives, journals, verse collections, writings on the occult, surveys, and more.

How to make oneself understood in France, from Penson’s Short Progress (Harley MS 3516 f. 44v)

Owing to the size of the collection, some works appear in several guises, reflecting contemporary manuscript copying and circulating practices (e.g. Harley MS 2224 and Harley 4619, papers relating to the parliament of 1628-9 and the imprisonment of Sir John Eliot and others in the Tower for non-payment of King Charles I’s forced loan).  In many cases manuscripts surprise the reader with humdrum incidental features, such as doodles, pen trials, shopping lists, bills, and recipes, bringing to life their writers, illustrators and former owners.

Doodles in a volume from Randle Holme’s library (‘Cheshire collections’, Harley MS 1988 f. 2v)

An incidental note in one of Randle Holme’s heraldic manuscripts: a bill from the indexer, complaining about past underpayment (Harley MS 1985 f. 127).

The current phase of the cataloguing project runs from April 2024 to April 2026.

Tabitha Driver
Cataloguer, Modern Archives and Manuscripts

Further reading:
A Catalogue of the Harleian Manuscripts in the British Museum, 4 vols (London: Eyre and Strahan, 1808-1812).
Cyril Ernest Wright, Fontes Harleiani: A study of the sources of the Harleian collection of manuscripts preserved in the Department of Manuscripts in the British Museum (London: British Museum, 1972
Cataloguing the Harley manuscripts - Medieval manuscripts blog (May 2019)

 

Some discoveries during the cataloguing projects:

Unexpected encounters of the fragmentary kind - Medieval manuscripts blog (June 2019)

New Prophecies of the Ancient Sibyls - Medieval manuscripts blog (December 2020)

A newly discovered manuscript from Byland Abbey - Medieval manuscripts blog (April 2021)

Deciphering an English exorcism manual - Medieval manuscripts blog (March 2022)

Records of homosexuality in 17th century England - Untold lives blog (April 2019)

Henry Stubbe: Islam and religious toleration in Restoration England - Untold lives blog (May 2019)

 

In December 1919, Paris was awash with diplomats.  The victors of the First World War met to calculate reparations and carve new political entities from collapsed empires.  Amidst these negotiations, a smaller diplomatic mission was conducted.  On 25 December, a British Captain named Norman Bray found himself rushing from hotel to hotel.  He hoped to arrange a meeting between representatives of two men who now dominated the Arabian Peninsula, and thereby prevent war breaking out between two British allies.

Bray was the political officer accompanying the ‘Najd Mission’.  This was a delegation representing the ruler of the Emirate of Najd, ‘Abd al-‘Azīz ibn Sa’ūd, and led by his teenage son, Shaikh Fayṣal bin ‘Abd al-‘Azīz Āl Sa‘ūd.  Under ibn Sa’ūd’s leadership, and with the help of an alliance with Britain, the Emirate had expanded rapidly.

Shaikh Fayṣal bin ‘Abd al-‘Azīz Āl Sa‘ūd, photographed in 1919 during the Mission’s visit to England. Source: Wikimedia Commons 

It now found itself clashing with its neighbour, the Hashemite Kingdom of the Hejaz.  The Hashemite ruler, King Husayn bin ‘Alī al-Hāshimī, had initiated the British-backed Arab Revolt against the Ottoman Empire.  His son Emir Fayṣal bin al-Husayn bin ‘Alī al-Hāshimī, the Revolt’s battlefield leader, had travelled to France to argue for a unified Arab state under Husayn’s rule.  The British were anxious to avoid a military clash between their allies, and so Bray sought to arrange a meeting in the hope that the sons might influence their fathers towards a peaceful resolution.

Emir Fayṣal bin al-Ḥusayn bin ‘Alī al-Hāshimī (centre) with his delegation at Versailles. Source: Wikimedia Commons  

Despite Bray’s hopes, almost all the Mission’s time in Paris passed without a meeting between the Shaikh and the Emir.  But on the evening of 25 December, the night before the Mission was to depart for Najd, the party found that Emir Fayṣal had left a card at their hotel.

The Mission received an invitation to meet Emir Fayṣal on the evening of 25 December 1919 - IOR/L/PS/10/391/1 f.557

Bray was eager to take advantage of this ‘un-expected courtesy’, but Aḥmad bin ‘Abdullāh Āl Thunayān- a key advisor to ibn Sa’ūd and senior member of the Najd Mission- refused to allow Shaikh Fayṣal to meet the Emir.  Aḥmad argued that the Emir’s failure to contact them earlier was disrespectful.  Bray nonetheless endeavoured to make contact himself, visiting ‘all the principal Hotels in Paris’.  He failed to find the Emir, but did encounter one of his advisors, Brigadier General Gabriel Haddad Pasha; the two agreed to bring the parties together.

Bray spent the night of Christmas 1919 searching Paris hotels, eventually finding Haddad Pasha, an advisor to the Emir - IOR/L/PS/10/391/1 f.558 

As neither side was willing to visit the other, Bray proposed a compromise- he would host a ‘private luncheon’ that both parties could attend without losing status.  Haddad Pasha agreed, provided that it was preceded by an introductory meeting.  This meeting was almost derailed by the refusal of one member of the Najd Mission to attend.

‘Abdulla’, a member of the Najd Mission, initially refused to go to the meeting with Emir Fayṣal, but was persuaded by Bray’s reminder that the meeting could benefit ibn Sa’ūd - IOR/L/PS/10/391/1 f.559 

Eventually, the Mission found themselves in Emir Fayṣal’s hotel room.  The conversation was ‘harmless’, other than a ‘rather tactless question’ from the Emir regarding the Ikhwan, ibn Sa’ūd’s fiercely loyal shock troops.  A ‘strain both in attitude and conversation’ ended the meeting.  Aḥmad ‘very politely refused’ the suggestion of further discussions and Bray abandoned the idea, lamenting that his last-minute diplomacy had failed.

Conflict between Najd and Hejaz proved to be unavoidable.  In 1925, ibn Sa’ūd conquered the Hejaz, absorbing the Hashemite kingdom into his state, soon to be renamed Saudi Arabia.  Emir Fayṣal became ruler of the short-lived Kingdom of Syria, and after a French army had driven him out, was established by the British as the ruler of the new Kingdom of Iraq.

Dan McKee
Content Specialist Archivist
British Library/Qatar Foundation Partnership

Further reading:
File 2182/1913 Pt 11 'Arabia: relations with BIN SAUD Hedjaz-Nejd Dispute', British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/10/391/1, in Qatar Digital Library 

Revolutions and Rebellions: Arab Revolt (Ottoman Empire/Middle East)

 

In this summer of major sporting competitions, we’re looking back to the 1940s and the exploits of the cadets of the Indian training ship Dufferin.

Notice of the application procedure for the Dufferin from The Indian Cadet Second Term 1944 - IOR/L/E/8/4977

The Indian Mercantile Marine Training Ship Dufferin was established at Bombay in 1927.  The ship prepared Indian youths for a career at sea, with Executive and Marine Engineering Branches.  Regulations from the 1940s state that applicants had to be aged between thirteen years and eight months and sixteen years, and they had to have reached a certain standard in education.  Qualifying examinations were held in different parts of India, and successful candidates had to pass an interview and medical and eyesight tests.  Although the focus was on training officers for the Merchant Navy, there were opportunities for boys to compete for commissions in the Royal Indian Navy.

Front cover of The Indian Cadet Second Term 1944 - IOR/L/E/8/4977

Reports of the sporting activities of Dufferin cadets in the 1940s are found in The Indian Cadet, the ship’s own journal published twice a year.  The boys played football and hockey, and competed in athletics and swimming.

Photograph of the Dufferin hockey and football teams in their sports kit and uniform jackets - The Indian Cadet First Term 1944 - IOR/L/E/8/4977

The Indian Cadet for Winter 1943 lists the results of athletics events.  Some of the times and distances are impressive.  Netto came first in the 100 yards for under 16s in a time of 12 seconds (record 11 seconds), whilst Wellington won the 100 yards open in 11.7 seconds (record 10.2 seconds).  Rees won the 120 yards hurdles (senior) in 19 seconds (record 15.4 seconds), and also triumphed in the long jump (open) with a leap of 17 feet 8½ inches (record 19 feet 10 inches).  Harding smashed the javelin record of 109 feet 5 inches with a throw of 128 feet 3 inches, and Jellicoe won the pole vault by clearing 8 feet ½ inch, easily beating the previous best of 7 feet 2 inches.  Valladaras ran a mile in 5 minutes 45 seconds.  A new event, the ‘Hop, Step and Jump’ (triple jump) was won by Ramakrishnan with 36 feet 5½ inches.

Table of athletics results - The Indian Cadet Winter 1943 -  IOR/L/E/8/4977

At the end of 1944 only fifteen cadets had not passed the ship’s swimming test, whilst seventeen held badges for proficiency.  For the first time, a cadet was entered for the Western India Swimming Championships.  Cadet Captain Aubrey William Wise was hampered by the lack of intensive training but acquitted himself well, reaching the finals of the under 18s breaststroke, free style, and backstroke.  At the ship’s Annual Aquatic Sports held at Back Bay Baths on 10 November 1944, Wise was named the best swimmer in the Dufferin for a third time.

Champion swimmer Cadet Captain Aubrey William Wise - The Indian Cadet Second Term 1944 - IOR/L/E/8/4977

‘Football Notes’ for the Second Term of 1943 reported that the team’s performance was not up to the usual high standard at the start of the season, although enthusiasm was not lacking.  An assessment of each of the players was given. Goalkeeper Jellicoe never hesitated ‘to use his boxing ability against the ball’.  Centre-forward Bhattacharya played a very swift game, dribbled well, and was a sure shot, with ‘the grace of an expert ball-room dancer’.  Outside-left Pillai was a promising fresher, but ‘gentle to a fault and forgets that Football is a game meant for men and not for girls’.  I hope I heard a sharp intake of breath from our readers then?

Margaret Makepeace
Lead Curator, East India Company Records

Further reading:
IOR/L/E/8/4977 Issues of the Dufferin journal The Indian Cadet 1942-1945
IOR/L/E/9/861-862 Indian Mercantile Marine Training ship Dufferin 1933-1947
IOR/V/27/750/13 Copies of the Dufferin prospectus 1928-1951

 

The India Office, like all government departments, received a large number of enquiries every year from members of the public. Occasionally these enquiries could be a little out of the ordinary. This was the case on 2 January 1862, when the India Office received a letter asking for information relating to a safe allegedly stolen from the Cantonment in Agra.

The letter was from a woman named Alice Buckley of Harisson's Alley Way, off Hudson Avenue, Brooklyn, USA, dated 16 December 1861. She asked about a safe containing a large sum of money, stolen from Agra in India. She believed it was situated 9 or 10 hundred miles from Calcutta and thought that there was a large reward offered for its recovery. She said it had been stolen before the outbreak of the Indian Mutiny (more commonly referred to now as the 1857 Uprising). She claimed that she could give the India Office all the information required for the recovery of the safe.

Alice's letter was forwarded to India, and on 30 April 1862 Sir George Couper, Secretary to the Government of the North Western Provinces, replied. Sir George wrote that enquiries had been instituted through the Commissioner of Agra. He had advised that in consequence of the destruction during the Mutiny of the records of the records of the Magisterial Officers and police stations, and in the absence of former police officers who were no longer in the service, it was impossible to discover any traces of the theft. The current Magistrate of Agra District reported that no information on the subject had reached him or the city police. Sir George recommended asking Alice for more information and offering her a reward if it led to the recovery of the safe.

The India Office wrote to Alice on 3 July 1862, and she replied in a letter dated 17 July giving more information on this tantalising affair. She stated that the safe was taken from the Cantonment office in Agra by a clerk named Spelman and two other men. They hid the safe, but a short time later were ordered to Lucknow as they belonged to the First Fusiliers. Spelman died on the march, and another of the men was wounded and sent home but died on the passage back to England. The remaining man ended up in America where he later died. Whilst dying he Alice the story and even gave her a map showing the spot where they hid the safe. She described it as green with a black stripe round each end, about 2 feet square. She said that Spelman told the two men that he saw £30,000 in golds 'mores' (mohur) being put in the safe plus a bag, although he didn't know what was in the bag. The hid the safe in Agra not far from the Artillery Lines. Alice said she was the widow of John Buckley, a pensioner who was discharged from the 73rd Regiment of Foot on 11 October 1827 in consequence of a wounded right hand.

Disappointingly, Herman Merivale of the India Office wrote back to Alice on 15 December 1863 that a strict investigation had been made into all the circumstances stated by her, but no information whatever could be obtained which tended to the recovery of the safe or throw any light on the transaction to which she had referred.

So, was it just a tall tale told to Alice by a dying man, or is there a hidden safe still waiting to be discovered?

John O'Brien
India Office Records

Further reading:
Iron safe containing money alleged to have been stolen from the Cantonment Office at Agra before the Mutiny broke out, 1861-1863, shelfmark: IOR/L/PJ/2/40, File 7/24.

The National Archives hold the discharge papers for a John Buckley, born 1805 in Carragh, Kildare, who was discharged from the 73rd Regiment of Foot on 26 September 1827 due to a gunshot wound to the right hand, reference WO 97/847/130. This may have been Alice's husband.

On 12 April 1842, Captain John Lyons, Agent to the East India Company in Egypt, based at Alexandria, forwarded his quarterly accounts to the Secretary at East India House, London. He confirmed payment from Company funds of 10,000 Egyptian piastres - equating to £100 Sterling - in aid of a fund to build an Anglican Protestant church at Alexandria.

Quarterly accounts of Captain John Lyons confirming payment from Company funds of £100 in aid of a fund to build an Anglican Protestant church at Alexandria -IOR/G/17/13, f 2 Factory Records: Egypt and the Red Sea, 1842-1844.

Receipt confirming payment from Company funds in aid of a fund to build an Anglican Protestant church at Alexandria - IOR/G/17/13, f11: Factory Records: Egypt and the Red Sea, 1842-1844.

Lyons’ primary role at Alexandria was to oversee the mail service between England and India, and to manage the Company’s agents who were located at key points along the mail and passenger transit route through Egypt from Alexandria to Suez.  He liaised regularly with the Egyptian Government over operational and some diplomatic matters, and often became involved in local matters involving the merchants and the British community at Alexandria, such as the church building scheme.

In September 1846, Lyons received a letter from Mr Saunders of the Alexandria Church Building Committee, asking for another contribution from the East India Company.  Saunders appealed to the ‘liberality’ and ‘good feeling and Generosity of the Honorable Company’, and described the current state of construction: ‘The front wall is now raised to the height of 33 feet, the Chancel 32 and the sides 28 feet. The quantity of materials are already sufficient to complete the Body of the Church, but the Timber for the roof is not yet provided’. Without further funds, the works would soon have to be halted.

Statement of contributions in aid of funds for building a Protestant Church in Alexandria. - IOR/G/17/14, f 227. Factory Records: Egypt and the Red Sea, 1845-1848.

£2,595 had already been raised, but another £3,000 was needed to complete the body of the church, the west front, tower and enclosure walls.  Saunders appealed to Lyons’ ‘well known very kindly feelings towards all the English Residents and [his] active interest … in every thing relating to their welfare’.  Lyons was supportive in his message to the Company: ‘whilst the expense has greatly exceeded the expectation of the Committee the solidity and beauty of the Church is likely to be commensurate with the sum expended’.  Lyons had received from Saunders an engraving of the church, possibly similar to the one below, by its designer the British architect James William Wild.

Engraving of St Mark’s Church, Alexandria, detail, 1840s. Victoria and Albert Museum.

Wild spent many years in Egypt, travelling there in 1842 to work as an architectural draughtsman for Egyptologist Karl Richard Lepsius. He was commissioned in 1845 to build the Anglican church in Alexandria and his design was notably influenced by Islamic architecture.

St Mark’s Church, Alexandria. The South Façade, 1840s. Drawn by J W Wild and etched by John Henry Le Keux. Victoria and Albert Museum.

Drawing by J J Frey of James William Wild at the start of the Lepsius expedition in Egypt, 1842 Wikipedia

Saunders’ request to the Company was on this occasion ‘negatived’.  The church, now known as St Mark’s Pro-Cathedral, was completed in 1854 without the campanile, indicating that perhaps Saunders’ wider fund-raising efforts met with limited success.

Ecclesiastical Despatch to Bengal 8 September 1847 approving that Saunders’ request to the Company had been ‘negatived’ - IOR/E/4/793, f 543.

Modern photograph of  St Mark's by kind permission of St Mark’s Pro-Cathedral, Alexandria.

Wild may have been disappointed that his design did not come to full fruition.  However he could console himself knowing that he had already completed seven church projects by 1842, including, Christ Church in Streatham, south-west London.  A Grade I listed building, Christ Church is famous for its modern use of polychromatic brickwork and patterning and semi-detached campanile.

Scale drawing of the west front of Christ Church, Streatham, signed by Wild, 1841. Victoria and Albert Museum.

Images of Christ Church, Streatham, copyright Amanda Engineer, May 2024.

Amanda Engineer
Content Specialist, Archivist
British Library/Qatar Foundation Partnership

Further reading:
Egypt and Red Sea Factory Records British Library IOR/G/17/13 & IOR/G/17/14
East India Company correspondence IOR/E/4/793
St Mark’s Anglican Church in Alexandria, Egypt 
James William Wild - Wikipedia
Christ Church, Streatham, by James William Wild (1814-1892): Part I
Streatham, Christ Church - The Diocese of Southwark 
Owen Jones (architect) - Wikipedia
Christ Church, Streatham: a history and guide, Payne, Joan, 1917-; Hargreaves, Brenda, 1927--; Ivory, Christopher. 3rd ed. /revised by Christopher Ivory, c.2000

 

We continue the story of Jabez Tepper, cousin of JMW Turner...

Jabez Tepper is buried in Brookwood Cemetery, Surrey, in a grave that contains several other Turner relatives.

Gravestone for Jabez Tepper at Brookwood Cemetery in Surrey. Photograph by author.

In January 1872, letters of administration for Tepper’s estate were granted to his cousin, William Coham Turner, as it was thought that he had died intestate.  This grant was revoked in July 1872, following the discovery of a will dated January 1835 which named his mother and her heirs as beneficiaries.  Tepper’s brother, Samuel, a house painter and carpenter, now the sole heir, was located in Alabama USA.  He returned to England in May 1872 and stayed with William Coham Turner in St John’s Wood, London.  The will was granted probate in August 1872.  In the documents Tepper is described as a bachelor.

Arrival of Samuel Tepper in England from Alabama - Leeds Times 11 May 1872 British Newspaper Archive

Samuel Tepper met with Victoria Boyer, Jabez Tepper’s elder married daughter.  Because they were illegitimate, neither Victoria nor Catherina had any claim on the estate, but Samuel Tepper wanted to do the right thing and gave a substantial sum to each of the sisters.

Shortly after Jabez Tepper’s death, Mary Pennell went to his offices in Bedford Row, with a friend, and arranged for the removal of furniture, a large chest of silver plate and other valuables, including a diamond snuff box, which had been a gift to JMW Turner from King Louis-Phillipe of France.  She also visited and removed items from the farm in Sussex where she had lived with Tepper.  She was later apprehended and taken to court, charged with theft.  Mary claimed that she had a right to the property as she had lived as Tepper’s wife for sixteen years but could produce no proof of marriage.  She denied the existence of any will, although there were rumours that copies had been destroyed.  At the preliminary hearing it was judged that there was insufficient evidence for a successful prosecution and the case was dismissed.

Samuel Tepper returned to his home in Camden, Alabama, in October 1873, with a substantial sum of money and several Turner paintings and engraving plates.  He disposed of many others before he left, not wishing to pay the duty for importing them.  He suffered from ill health and probably depression and, in 1887, took his own life.

Gold snuff-box with floral and foliate ornament.  On the lid is the monogram LP with crown above for Louis Philippe, all in diamonds set in silver. © The Trustees of the British Museum 

After Samuel Tepper’s return from America, it appears that Mary Pennell had to return items that she had taken, including the Louis-Phillipe snuff box. The box was donated to the British Museum in 1944 by Maria Helena Turner, the great-grand-daughter of J.M.W. Turner's uncle, John Turner.

In 1877, the surviving beneficiaries of JMW Turner’s will brought a case against the estate of Jabez Tepper.  Tepper had bought their shares in Turner’s engravings for what he claimed was a fair price of £500 for each beneficiary.  This had netted him £2,500. When the engravings were auctioned after Tepper’s death, they fetched £35,000.  The family’s lawyers produced evidence that the engravings had been valued at £5,000 for legacy duty, so Tepper had been well aware of their real value.  The court found in the plaintiffs’ favour and ordered that the sale to Tepper be set aside.  An appeal by the Tepper estate failed.

Report of court ruling - Brief 15 December 1877 British Newspaper Archive

There is a certain irony in the coincidence that Jabez Tepper, having thwarted Turner’s plans for his inheritance, was similarly thwarted in his own. In both cases, large portions of the estate went to people they were never intended for.

CC-BY
David Meaden
Independent Researcher

Creative Commons Attribution licence

Further reading:
British Newspaper Archive for reports on the court cases involving the Turner estate, the prosecution of Mary Pennell, and Samuel Tepper’s visit to England.

 

Turner’s restored house in Twickenham is open to visitors.